During the early to mid-1990s the
National Weather Service (NWS) installed a network of powerful Doppler
radars
across the United States. Known as the NEXRAD or WSR-88D radars,
they were a huge advance for weather prediction and warning
capabilities across the U.S. Here in the Pacific Northwest,
NEXRAD radars were placed on Camano Island, at Scappose near Portland,
and on the
top
of Mt. Ashland near Medford (7500 ft!), as well as close to Spokane and
Pendleton.
Although these radars represented a major improvement from the nearly
radarless situation before, some major problems became apparent.
A
huge issue was the lack of radar coverage over the coastal zone and
offshore (see figures below). Furthermore, there was no coverage over
the wet, windward sides of most of the regional coastal mountains,
hampering prediction of flooding. And, of course, coastal
residents lacked the benefits of being able to use the radar for
planning business and recreational activities.
Beginning in the late 1990s, a group of
Northwest meteorologists and interested organizations began an effort
for securing a radar for the Washington coast. The group included
University of Washington meteorologists, TV weathercasters from
throughout the region, local environmental groups such as Friends of
Grays Harbor, local timber companies such as Port Blakely Tree Farms,
local fisher and crabber organizations, and many of the local
municipalities. Rarely has such a wide-ranging group of
scientists, resource companies, media, environmental groups and
governmental representatives come together to advocate a major project.
Compelling evidence for the value of a coastal
radar was provided during January and February 2001 when a research
radar
was placed at Westport, WA during the IMPROVE-2 field experiment
(directed towards understanding the nature of precipitation processes
influencing our regon). As shown in the figure below, the research
radar clearly showed the structure of approaching storms and documented
heavy
precipitation on the coastal mountains. NWS forecasters
repeatedly noted the substantial value of the coastal radar for local
forecasting during that period.
Image from a coastal radar at
Wesport during the
IMPROVE-2 Experiment. A strong front with intense rainfall
is approaching the Northwest coast.
Even with strong community support and a solid scientific case for the
radar, there was little movement towards the acquisition of such a unit
by the National Weather Service. However, as described below the
situation would change substantially in 2008 due to a major storm and
the intervention of
U.S. Senator Maria Cantwell.
During December 2-4, 2007 a catastrophic storm struck the western
portions of Washington and Oregon. Winds along the coast gusted above
70 mph for nearly 24 hours, causing extensive treefalls, building
damage, and power outages. Some gusts reached 125 mph. At the
same time, very heavy precipitation--up to 20 inches in 24 hours--hit
the coastal mountains of southwest Washington. The resulting
flooding and slope failures were extraordinary. With no coastal
radar viewing the windward (heavy precipitation) side
of the terrain and the Camano and Portland radars poorly positioned to
get reliable information, the National Weather Service was
unable to secure a good idea of how much precipitation was falling in
real-time. The result was inadequate short-term forecasts. The
Chehalis River flooded and without sufficient warning,
farmers and others were unable to move many animals and assets to dry
ground.
Several towns were flooded and Interstate 5 was closed for days.
Damage was in the tens of millions of dollars.

The town of Chehalis and I5 were flooded in December 2007
In response to this storm and previous calls for a coastal radar
acquistion, Senator Cantwell's staff organized a meeting on March 6,
2008 at Grays Harbor Community College regarding the need for a
radar. A large group attended, including representatives of
Congressmen Dicks, Inslee, and Bard, local cities and counties, the
private sector, the University of Washingon, local environmental
groups, local citizens, and the National Weather Service. The
group overwhelmingly supported a coastal radar acquisition.
A major breakthrough occurred during March 2009, when Senator Cantwell
secured a $2 million appropropriation to begin the acquistion
of a coastal radar. With that funding, the National Weather Service
funded a study on the
need for a new radar by some radar experts at the University of
Oklahoma
and University of Massachusetts. The final
report,
released
in
January
2009,
concluded
"severe
deficiencies
exist across the radar gap
regions identified in Washington" and that severe storm warning times
were "below average." It stated that additional radar coverage
would "improve public safety and reduce the negative economic
consequences from hazardous weather." In short, the report
made it clear that a very serious problem of inadequate radar coverage
existed and needed to be corrected as soon as possible.
In late 2009, Senator Cantwell and her allies on the Washington
congressional delegation were able to secure full funding for the radar
(another 7 million dollars--as we will see not all of this funding will
be needed). The new funding allowed the National Weather Service to
hire contractors to evaluate several potential sites, with substantial
assistance by Dr. Socorro Medina and others at the University of
Washington. In addition, environmental assessments were made of
the finalist locations to insure minimal impact to people or
wildlife.
During 2010, the Langley Hill site was determined to be the best by all
measures and on March 18th a lease for the land was signed; days
later construction was initiated. The National Weather
Service and its contractors are confident the radar will be fully
operational by the end of September 2011, ready for the upcoming storm
season. Keep in mind, 2011-2012 should be a neutral El Nino/La
Nina year and such years have brought the most damaging storms on
record to our area.
The first question is what will this
new radar see? It is possible to simulate the coverage, including
the
impact of terrain, and that has been done by a National Weather Service
contractor and by UW scientists applying sophisticated radar beam
simulation software. First, here is the NWS map, showing coverage
at 2,000, 4000, and 10,000 ft above the radar.