SCHEDULE
ATM S 211: Winter Quarter 2002 
  Climate and Climate Change



Notes for Tuesday March 5

Here is an overview of the science of global warming, starting with specifying emissions scenarios for the future and ending with estimating the impacts of those emissions.
 

emissions ---> concentrations  ---> radiative forcing                                          
 
 

     feedbacks
 

    climate change (planetary)
 

     sea-level
 

    climate change  (regional)    
 

    ecological, economic, social impacts



In considering emissions, concentration and radiative forcing, it's necessary to take into account, not only CO2, but the full suite of greenhouse gases and aerosols.  Here's a check list for all the things that need to be estimated.
 

                                                 Emissions                 Concentrations               Radiative Forcing

carbon dioxide
methane
nitrous oxide
halocarbons
ozone (stratosphere)
ozone (troposphere)
soot
sulfates (direct)
sulfates (indirect)
land use (albedo)



Future carbon dioxide concentrations will rise, even if emissions stay constant.  The future rate of rise of carbon dioxide will depend upon the uptake by the land and the ocean.  The observed rate of increase is roughly half the rate at which CO2 is being added to the atmosphere by the burning of fossil fuels, but that feacrion varies from one year to the next. http://www.ipcc.ch/pub/tar/wg1/fig3-3.htm
 

There's evidence that the uptake by the land was greater during the1990's than during the 1980's and the rate of increase of atmospheric CO2 did not keep up with the rising rate of emissions.  Here are the numbers based on analysis of CO2 and O2 measurements.
http://www.ipcc.ch/pub/tar/wg1/fig3-4.htm

BURNING  =   ATM INCR  +   OCEAN UPTAKE  + LAND UPTAKE

  estimates in Gt / year
 

198O's
    5.5  =      3.3   +        2.0        +     0.2

1990's
   6.4   =      3.2   +        1.8        +     1.4
 
 

Deforestation in the tropics is estimated to have released more CO2 into the atmosphere than reforestation at higher latitudes has removed.  Here are the numbers.  The land uptake is different from the value given above because it was estimated based on different data.

LAND UPTAKE    =   LAND USE CHANGE   -   RESIDUAL SINK

1989-98

     0.7                    =                   -1.6                           +2.3
                                              deforestation         the "missing sink"

At this point we do not know where the missing carbon is going or how  this partitioning is likely to evolve in the 21st century. For example, will the oceans continue to take up as much as they have in the past or will they become 'saturated'?  Will the mysterious 'land sink' continue to be operative? A similar analysis need to be made for each of the constituents listed in the table. For shorter lived constituents, concentration tends to be proportional to emissions.


                                                                     Radiative Forcing

carbon dioxide
methane
nitrous oxide
halocarbons
ozone (stratosphere)
ozone (troposphere)
soot
sulfates (direct)
sulfates (indirect)
land use (albedo)

Estimates of the radiative forcing by the above constituents are given in the IPCC Report  http://www.ipcc.ch/pub/tar/wg1/figts-9.htm

The warming induced by the combined radiative forcing shown in this figure amounts to ~1 C for a doubling of CO2.  The actual projected warming is higher than that, by a factor of 2-3.  The difference is due to the existence of feedbacks.


Feedbacks     inferred from simple calculations, models

water vapor    +     constant relative humidity yields a doubling; contested
ice                  +     modest
clouds            ?     potentially large
land surface   +     potentially large in semi-arid regions during summer.



 

Climate change (planetary):   inferred from global climate models
   warming (global-mean, spatial distribution)
   hydrologic cycle (rainfall, evaporation)
   seasonal distribution
   day / night differences
   hurricanes
   El Niño, Arctic Oscillation
   ozone layer


Sea level rise:   inferred from ocean models
   amount
   timing

Principally due to the expansion of sea water as it warms.  Melting sea ice doesn't contribute, since sea ice is already floating. Melting of mountain glaciers and continental ice sheets is ignored.



 

Climate change (regional):   inferred from regional climate models
   winter snow pack
   runoff, seasonal distribution
   start, end of growing season
   water availability, flood risks
   impacts of sea-level rise



 

Ecological impacts
   survival of species
   range of species
   dominance of various species
 
 
 
 

 

Back to Top